JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 28, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Maria Patricia Jimenez Aarango

✓
Topic · hard data
Correccion Error Parte Resolutiva Sentencia C-1077/02
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Corrección de parte resolutiva
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se realizó la corrección de la parte resolutiva de la Sentencia C-1077/02, toda vez que por error se dispuso estarse a lo resuelto en la Sentencia C-1074/02 cuando en realidad la decisión ha debido remitir a la Sentencia C-1076/02 para esos efectos resulta necesario corregir el anterior error.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Corregir la parte resolutiva de la Sentencia C-1077 de 2002, indicando que la decisión de esta Corte consiste en estarse a lo resuelto en la Sentencia C-1076 de 2002. Por lo tanto, en lo sucesivo, dicha parte resolutiva quedará así:
  2. "ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-1076 del 5 de diciembre de 2002, en cuanto declaró la inexequibilidad del
  3. cuarto. inciso del artículo 175 de la Ley 734 de 2002"
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.